Comparisons
Audact vs the alternatives
How Audact compares to the voice-AI platforms agencies evaluate — verified, with sources and dates on each page.
Audact vs Retell
Retell has no EU residency and no Article 50 — Audact is the EU-hosted alternative with a signed receipt for every call.
CompareMigrating from Retell? See the migration guideAudact vs Vapi
Vapi is a US developer platform with no EU servers. Audact is built for regulator-facing proof, not just call orchestration.
CompareMigrating from Vapi? See the migration guideAudact vs Synthflow
Synthflow offers agency white-label with basic GDPR. Audact adds Article 50 enforcement and a cryptographic evidence chain.
CompareMigrating from Synthflow? See the migration guideAudact vs Famulor
Famulor is live in DE but has no patents, no evidence chain and no brand governance. Audact ships all three by default.
CompareAudact vs GetVocal
GetVocal markets EU AI Act readiness. Audact backs the claim with per-call attestation and an auditable receipt.
CompareAudact vs Fonio
Compare Fonio's voice-agent offering against Audact's compliance-first platform for regulated EU verticals.
CompareYour provider is now liable (PLD)
From 9 December 2026, white-label agencies can be treated as the manufacturer under the EU Product Liability Directive. Here's what changes.
CompareSwitching providers?
We'll scope the migration on a 20-minute call. EU-hosted in Frankfurt, Article 50 at runtime, a signed receipt for every call.