Legal-Tech DACH — AI Compliance for German Legal Tech
Voice and chat AI for DACH legal-tech. Per-decision rationale logging (right-to-explanation-style, supporting Article 86 where it applies), legal-privilege compartmentalisation, and Berufsordnung scope-of-practice enforcement are live. RA-MICRO integration is on the roadmap for Q1 2027.
Integration stack
RA-MICRO
DACH legal practice-management write-back (on the roadmap for Q1 2027): matters, time, document templates.
Right-to-explanation-style logging
Per-decision rationale logged, retrievable, and disclosable to the data subject — supports an Article 86-style right to explanation where it applies.
Berufsordnung enforcement
Patent-pending scope-of-practice rules block AI agents from giving advice beyond authorised competence.
Legal privilege
Patent-pending privileged-communication compartmentalisation — privileged turns never leak into general training or retention.
Why legal-tech specifically
DACH legal-tech sits at the intersection of Berufsordnung restrictions, right-to-explanation expectations (Article 86-style, where it applies), AI Act high-risk classification, and absolute privilege expectations from clients. Generic voice AI cannot deliver on any of those out of the box.
Audact builds scope-of-practice enforcement, decision-rationale logging, and privileged-data compartmentalisation as runtime primitives — into the core, not stitched on later.
Ecosystem fit
Audact legal-tech fits the tooling DACH firms and legal-information providers already use to build AI-augmented practitioner workflows.
For agencies building DACH legal-tech products: white-label, sub-accounts, Stripe Connect.