API · Multi-regulation
One engine. A policy pack per regime.
POST https://api.audact.ai/v1/policy/evaluate
The public API host. The code examples document the intended interface and the endpoints used within the current product.
No public API is served on this host yet, apart from the published Merkle roots at /v1/metachain. The endpoints used inside the product are not the same thing as a public API.
Why this status
- Claim
- In development · By application
- Scope
- The public API host. The code examples document the intended interface and the endpoints used within the current product.
- Ground
- No public API is served on this host yet, apart from the published Merkle roots at /v1/metachain. The endpoints used inside the product are not the same thing as a public API.
- What it does not establish
- That any individual endpoint works today. That is confirmed per endpoint, and the confirmation is open.
- What you can get today
- Production access sits inside an applicable paid agreement. Endpoints are not priced separately.
- Last checked
- 5 October 2026
- Where to check it
- /apis
Germany: national policy layer active. Netherlands: in development. Belgium and Austria: planned.
Regimes differ; the machinery underneath does not. You enable a policy pack per country and per regime, and every decision it makes writes into the same evidence chain. An auditor asking about the AI Act and an auditor asking about consent get one export rather than two systems. Switching a pack on is a configuration change, not a release.
POST /v1/policy/evaluate
curl -X POST https://api.audact.ai/v1/policy/evaluate \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $AUDACT_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"jurisdiction": "DE",
"packs": ["aia-50", "gdpr", "uwg-outbound"],
"channel": "voice",
"action": "outbound_dial",
"context": { "consent_reference": "consent_8h2k9d7" }
}'Packs compose. Enabling a second one does not change how the first behaves.
200 OK · one verdict, per-pack reasons
{
"verdict": "ALLOW",
"conditions": [
{ "pack": "aia-50", "requires": "spoken_disclosure_before_first_turn" },
{ "pack": "uwg-outbound", "requires": "opt_out_offer_before_close" }
],
"pack_versions": {
"aia-50": "2026.08.02",
"gdpr": "2026.05.01",
"uwg-outbound": "2026.07.01"
},
"call_id": "7f3c2a1e-0000-4000-8000-000000000000"
}The dates that already passed
- The transparency duties of Article 50 apply. It is a transparency duty, not a prohibition.
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Art. 50 · applicable since 2 August 2026
- Unsolicited commercial communication to a natural person requires prior consent.
- Telecommunicatiewet (NL), art. 11.7 · amendment in force since 1 July 2026
- ICT-related incident management and reporting obligations for financial entities.
- Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA), Art. 17 · applicable since 17 January 2025
- Transparency obligations for online platforms, including advertising and recommender systems.
- Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (DSA) · applicable since 17 February 2024
- For SMEs and start-ups the penalty ceiling under the AI Act is the lower of €15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover, not the higher.
- Commission guidelines C(2026)5054 of 20 July 2026, point (152)
What runs on the engine
- Article 50 disclosure and its attestation, per jurisdiction.
- In controlled testing
- GDPR: lawful basis, consent provenance, decision trail under Art. 22.
- In development
- Outbound eligibility under the German and Dutch rules.
- In controlled testing · Germany: national policy layer active. Netherlands: in development. Belgium and Austria: planned.
- One auditor export covering every pack you have enabled.
- DORA, MiCA, MDR/IVDR and ISO 42001 control-evidence packs.
- In development
Coverage
What the law says, and what we do about it.
What the law demands carries a source, what we build carries a status.
- Regime
- EU AI Act, Art. 50(1)
- Source
- Reg. (EU) 2024/1689 · in force 2 Aug 2026
- What Audact does
- Disclosure in the call, recorded
- Pack status
- In controlled testing
- Regime
- EU AI Act, Art. 50(2)
- Source
- Reg. (EU) 2024/1689
- What Audact does
- Machine-readable marking of synthetic audio
- Pack status
- Planned
- Regime
- GDPR
- Source
- Reg. (EU) 2016/679 · Art. 6, 7, 17, 22
- What Audact does
- Consent provenance and decision trail
- Pack status
- In development
- Regime
- NL Telecomwet
- Source
- Telecommunicatiewet art. 11.7 · since 1 Jul 2026
- What Audact does
- Outbound eligibility chain
- Pack status
- In controlled testing · Germany: national policy layer active. Netherlands: in development. Belgium and Austria: planned.
- Regime
- UWG (DE)
- Source
- § 7(2) UWG
- What Audact does
- Consent and opt-out conditions on outbound
- Pack status
- In controlled testing
- Regime
- DSA
- Source
- Reg. (EU) 2022/2065 · since 17 Feb 2024
- What Audact does
- Content and algorithm transparency records
- Pack status
- In development
- Regime
- DORA
- Source
- Reg. (EU) 2022/2554 · since 17 Jan 2025
- What Audact does
- ICT incident and resilience records
- Pack status
- In development
- Regime
- MiCA
- Source
- Reg. (EU) 2023/1114 · since 30 Dec 2024
- What Audact does
- Communications policy pack
- Pack status
- In development
- Regime
- MDR / IVDR
- Source
- Reg. (EU) 2017/745 and 2017/746
- What Audact does
- Clinical-communication scope gating
- Pack status
- In development
- Regime
- Product liability
- Source
- Dir. (EU) 2024/2853 · applies 9 Dec 2026
- What Audact does
- Records that show who put their name on what
- Pack status
- In development
- Regime
- ISO 42001
- Source
- Voluntary standard, no certification claimed
- What Audact does
- Control-evidence export for your own audit
- Pack status
- In development
Why one engine
Two auditors, one export.
- A single evidence substrate with policy-specific controls on top, not one chain that claims to satisfy every regulator.
- Per-jurisdiction overlays: the same engine, a different pack, applied at dispatch time.
- Product liability changes on 9 December 2026, and it is a directive: transposition runs per member state.
Questions
- What does a pack status of 'in development' mean?
- That we are building it and it is not available to switch on. It does not mean certified, third-party attested, or piloted with a customer.
- Does one evidence chain satisfy every regulator?
- No, and nobody should claim that. What it gives you is one evidence substrate with policy-specific controls on top: the plumbing is shared, the controls are per regime.
- Do you hold an ISO 42001 certification?
- No. The pack exports control evidence for your own management system; it is not a certification of Audact and it is not a certification of you.
Every framework, with its source
The compliance index carries one page per regime: what it requires, since when, and which article says so.
Related
All six APIs All frameworks One page per regime.
DORA Applicable since 17 January 2025.
Deadlines What has passed and what is coming.
The policy engine How a pack is written.
Product liability 9 December 2026, per member state.
